Pride Month Part III: America Exporting Sinful ‘Values’ Around the World

What exactly is the American Military Industrial Complex exporting?

“For the day of the Lord of hosts shall be upon every one that is proud and lofty, and upon every one that is lifted up; and he shall be brought low.”—Isaiah 2:12

In Part I, I wrote about how the celebration of sin during Pride Month is a reminder that our society is near collapse. In Part II, I wrote about how both sides of the political circus are to blame for the porous state of our nation.

Now, I’ll turn to how America is trying to take down the rest of the world with it. I’ll note, it’s not just America but the West in general, but America acts as the enforcer of the globalist regime’s agenda with its Military Industrial Complex.

There may need to be a change in the tagline for the American empire from “making the world safe for democracy” to “making the world safe for sodomy.”

Let me start off by saying I will always oppose the hubristic foreign policy that has been adopted by America over the last century or so of spreading “American values” around the world, no matter what perceived “values” are being spread. But today, it’s abundantly clear that the “values” guiding the American empire are those of the sodomite cabal.

Let’s take a look at what’s happening at U.S. embassies around the world.

Here’s the embassy near the Vatican:

Here’s in Canada:

In Ireland:

In Australia:

The list goes on and on and on. Most of those countries are perfectly fine with it. They, too, have submitted to the sodomites.

But here’s one that shows just how much the American empire wants nation’s around the world to submit to them. This is in Uganda:

Not only did they raise the “Pride Flag,” they took down the Ugandan flag. This comes the week that Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed a new bill dubbed an “anti-gay” bill into law. That bill, it brings justice to those who have been raped by sodomite rapists and those given sexually transmitted diseases from those knowingly HIV positive engaging in sodomy.

Politico reported that is “doesn’t criminalize those who identify as LGBTQ,” It does offer the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” which includes rape of “minors and other categories of vulnerable people.” Homosexuality was already defined as “against the order of nature” in Ugandan law, and 30 out of 54 African countries criminalize homosexuality.

I want to note one line from Politico’s piece which stated “anti-gay sentiment in Uganda has grown in recent weeks amid news coverage alleging sodomy in boarding schools, including a prestigious one for boys where a parent accused a teacher of abusing her son.”

Note the focus from the American mainstream media there. Politico is more concerned with “anti-gay sentiment” than boys being sodomized by pedophile teachers.

In February, Museveni said:

“We are not going to follow people who are lost. These Europeans are not normal, they don’t listen. We have been telling them please, this problem of homosexuality is not something that you should normalize and celebrate. [The Western countries] don’t listen, they don’t respect other people’s views and they want to turn the abnormal into normal and force it on others. We shall not agree.”

And indeed, the West does want to force its sodomite agenda as Politico reported the “U.S. has warned of economic consequences over legislation.”

Guess who thinks America isn’t going far enough in its threats against Uganda? Republicans, of course. Specifically, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Richard Grennell, the first open sodomite presidential adviser under Donald Trump.

Life Site News reported on it. Cruz’s response on Twitter:

“This Uganda law is horrific & wrong. Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’ is grotesque & an abomination. ALL civilized nations should join together in condemning this human rights abuse.”

Grennell thanked Cruz for submission to his sinful lifestyle and said Trump would be far better at protecting sodomites around the world than Biden. Grennell Tweeted:

“Another example of what is happening around the world without Donald Trump as President of the United States. Thank you, Senator Cruz for speaking out now. We made it clear to Uganda in the Trump Administration that criminalizing homosexuality is wrong. No one should be in jail for being gay. Ugandan leaders understood the message. Why hasn’t the Biden State Department been as clear as we were?!”

Now, I want to turn to Russian President Vladimir Putin and what he had to say in 2021. This speech may go a long way in explaining the West’s disdain for Russia. Here’s the video where Putin takes on the West.

I’ll point out, the full video and transcript, posted by the Kremlin, will show Putin isn’t to be trusted as he regurgitates the same lies from the West with regards to covid and climate change. But when it comes to the moral rot emanating from the West and America, Putin is spot on.

Putin starts the portion by describing the “importance of a solid support in the sphere of morals, ethics and values is increasing dramatically in the modern fragile world. In point of fact, values are a product, a unique product of cultural and historical development of any nation.”

On the West, Putin said:

“We look in amazement at the processes underway in the countries which have been traditionally looked at as the standard-bearers of progress. Of course, the social and cultural shocks that are taking place in the United States and Western Europe are none of our business; we are keeping out of this. Some people in the West believe that an aggressive elimination of entire pages from their own history, ‘reverse discrimination’ against the majority in the interests of a minority, and the demand to give up the traditional notions of mother, father, family and even gender, they believe that all of these are the mileposts on the path towards social renewal.

Listen, I would like to point out once again that they have a right to do this, we are keeping out of this. But we would like to ask them to keep out of our business as well. We have a different viewpoint, at least the overwhelming majority of Russian society – it would be more correct to put it this way – has a different opinion on this matter. We believe that we must rely on our own spiritual values, our historical tradition and the culture of our multiethnic nation.

The advocates of so-called ‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind of a new and better consciousness. Godspeed, hoist the flags as we say, go right ahead. The only thing that I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but Russia has been there already. After the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways and customs and not just political and economic ones, but the very notion of human morality and the foundations of a healthy society. The destruction of age-old values, religion and relations between people, up to and including the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed progress and, by the way, was widely supported around the world back then and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way, the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than theirs.

This, I believe, should call to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed to see the domestic practices, which we, fortunately, have left, I hope, in the distant past. The fight for equality and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering on absurdity, when the works of the great authors of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed to be backward. The classics are declared backward and ignorant of the importance of gender or race. In Hollywood memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters of what color or gender should be in a movie. This is even worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

Countering acts of racism is a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has turned it into ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism. The obsessive emphasis on race is further dividing people, when the real fighters for civil rights dreamed precisely about erasing differences and refusing to divide people by skin color. I specifically asked my colleagues to find the following quote from Martin Luther King: ‘I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by their character.’ This is the true value. However, things are turning out differently there. By the way, the absolute majority of Russian people do not think that the color of a person's skin or their gender is an important matter. Each of us is a human being. This is what matters.

In a number of Western countries, the debate over men’s and women’s rights has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria. Look, beware of going where the Bolsheviks once planned to go – not only communalizing chickens, but also communalizing women. One more step and you will be there.

Zealots of these new approaches even go so far as to want to abolish these concepts altogether. Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risk being ostracized. ‘Parent number one’ and ‘parent number two,’ ‘'birthing parent’ instead of ‘mother,’ and ‘human milk’ replacing ‘breastmilk’ because it might upset the people who are unsure about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new; in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.

Not to mention some truly monstrous things when children are taught from an early age that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. That is, the teachers actually impose on them a choice we all supposedly have. They do so while shutting the parents out of the process and forcing the child to make decisions that can upend their entire life. They do not even bother to consult with child psychologists – is a child at this age even capable of making a decision of this kind? Calling a spade a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is being done in the name and under the banner of progress.

Well, if someone likes this, let them do it. I have already mentioned that, in shaping our approaches, we will be guided by a healthy conservatism. That was a few years ago, when passions on the international arena were not yet running as high as they are now, although, of course, we can say that clouds were gathering even then. Now, when the world is going through a structural disruption, the importance of reasonable conservatism as the foundation for a political course has skyrocketed – precisely because of the multiplying risks and dangers, and the fragility of the reality around us.

This conservative approach is not about an ignorant traditionalism, a fear of change or a restraining game, much less about withdrawing into our own shell. It is primarily about reliance on a time-tested tradition, the preservation and growth of the population, a realistic assessment of oneself and others, a precise alignment of priorities, a correlation of necessity and possibility, a prudent formulation of goals, and a fundamental rejection of extremism as a method. And frankly, in the impending period of global reconstruction, which may take quite long, with its final design being uncertain, moderate conservatism is the most reasonable line of conduct, as far as I see it. It will inevitably change at some point, but so far, do no harm – the guiding principle in medicine – seems to be the most rational one. Noli nocere, as they say.

Again, for us in Russia, these are not some speculative postulates, but lessons from our difficult and sometimes tragic history. The cost of ill-conceived social experiments is sometimes beyond estimation. Such actions can destroy not only the material, but also the spiritual foundations of human existence, leaving behind moral wreckage where nothing can be built to replace it for a long time.”

America’s meddling in the affairs of others has always been foolish and wrong. And today’s meddling is one openly sinful, openly anti-Christ.

“He who passes by and meddles in a quarrel not his own Is like one who takes a dog by the ears.”—Proverbs 26:17